_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageLoadTime']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();

Posts Tagged “property”

As home values continue to decline and many Americans continue to battle unemployment, extracting additional income out of one's home has become one solid way to bridge the economic gap. Dawn Kawamoto of our sister site, DailyFinance, outlines some smart ways to make your house make money for you.

The U.S. economy is slowly staggering out of the Great Recession and employment figures show signs of promise, but after nearly three years of financial drought, many Americans still feel their budgets are under pressure. Faced with depleted stock portfolios and shrunken savings accounts, homeowners looking to pump up their finances may want to turn to their greatest assets -- their homes.

But when we talk about turn your castle into a bank, we're not talking about using it as a home-equity loan cash machine as so many did during the bubble years. We're talking about ways to actually bring in extra income from your property.

The ideas we'll present, while varied, all carry a common theme -- renting out some portion of the property. The degree to which that might intrude on a homeowner's lifestyle varies, too: Renting out your backyard to campers or gardeners, or renting a driveway to frustrated commuters who can never find parking will have more of an impact on your daily life than leasing a 500-square-foot parcel for a cellular tower.

 

 

Read more at DailyFinance.

Comments No Comments »

9078 Heathwood

2 bed, 2 bath spacious corner unit with hardwood flooring and storage .Come & see today!  Buyer responsible for any/all compliances, escrows etc if required. All inspections/systems tests are at buyers expense. Offers require pre-approval & EM due in certified funds at acceptance. Addendum required after seller accepts offer. Cash deals require proof funds. Buyer to verify room count, PIN#s, zoning, schools etc. View the many pictures we have to offer at www.illinoisforeclosuredeals.com and call today to schedule a viewing of this property at 847-967-0022. This listing is exclusively represented by the Helen Oliveri Team of Keller Williams Realty.

Comments No Comments »

Commentary

The housing sector continues to show signs of recovery. Together the tax credit (which expired at the end of April), the more upbeat consumer confidence, and favorable market conditions all contributed to bolstering April’s sales activity – with existing home sales increasing for the second straight month.

The return of buyer confidence with much of the home price correction believed to be over, encouraging economic developments and historically low mortgage rates, will provide the stepping stone for further market stabilization.

Meanwhile, stagnant job growth and elevated levels of foreclosure continue to be cause for concern. The government is now taking proactive steps to restructure the mortgage industry with risk-management measures seen by experts as a “huge cut in red tape” that would ultimately benefit consumers.

The Housing Market

Existing Home Sales

Existing home sales strengthened in April to 5.77 million, up 8.7% from March and 22.8%from last April. This is the tenth consecutive month of year-over-year increases.

According to Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, although part of the uptick was expected from the tax credit, there’s also been a return of buyer confidence, for those who remained on the sideline last year. The return of confidence is a result of stabilized prices, an improved economy, and continued advantageous interest rates.

In March, 49% of sales were from first-time buyers.

Median Home Price

The median price for an existing home was $173,100 in April, up 2.1% from a year ago and 4% from March. Distressed homes, accounting for a third of last month’s sales, continued skewing prices downward slightly as they typically are discounted 15% compared to typical home sales. Overall, prices this past year showed increased stability over the previous year.

Inventory

Total housing inventory rose slightly to 4.04 million in March, representing slightly less than an eight-and-a-half month supply of sales (if homes continue to sell at the current pace consistently and no new homes come on the market). Compared to the previous year, there are now 3% more homes on the market. Although this is the first rise in twenty consecutive months of decline when compared to the previous year, NAR’s chief economist believes this increase can be attributed to the summer selling season and that home prices are back on track.

Mortgage Rates

Mortgage rates dipped back below 5% this month due largely in part to the European debt crisis. As confidence in the value of the Euro eroded, more investors chose the U.S. dollar instead. With more demand for dollars, the cost of debt (interest rate) dropped. This event has also shown the global recovery is not free-and-clear of roadblocks to complete recovery. However, experts still anticipate rates will increase to between 6% and 6.5% by the end of the year. As the recovery gains increasing traction, the Federal Reserve will need to increase rates to prevent inflation.

Affordability

Affordability remains advantageous, supported by some of the lowest mortgage rates in decades as well as less expensive home prices. The home price-to-income ratio continues to remain well below the historical average of 25%. The ratio now stands at 14.9%.

Sources: National Association of Realtors, Freddie Mac

Government Action

FHA Turns to Lenders to Monitor Brokers

As the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), the government agency that insures home loans, saw its market share rise to about one-third of the mortgage market last year, up from 2% in 2006, the number of brokers seeking to arrange FHA-backed loans has mushroomed to 9,043 at the end of 2009 from 5,759 just two years earlier.

The agency, finding itself inadequately equipped to monitor its brokers, is shifting the responsibility to its lenders.

The FHA expects the new policies to result in better risk management, and the cut in red tape should produce better rates for consumers.

As of May 20, the FHA no longer certifies mortgage brokers or tracks the performance of brokers’ loans. Instead, lenders are now required to sponsor brokers and assume responsibility for loans they originate, including losses from fraud or mistakes in underwriting. In addition to revamping broker insight, the agency also beefed up oversight of its lenders by increasing net-worth requirements to $1 million from $250,000. The change is in effect for one year for existing lenders.

Source: WSJ.com

Topics For Buyers & Sellers

Myths about Distressed Properties – Debunked!

Distressed properties – foreclosures and short sales alike – represent potentially great value for prospective buyers. However, common misconceptions about the time and money investment involved with buying such properties may keep many from inquiring further into this market. KW Research survey findings, taken from more than 2,500 KW associate respondents who have worked with distressed properties, can help steer clear of concerns as you make your way to homeownership.

Buyer Concern Research Found

It’s going to take forever to find
one I want.

3 out of 5 REO buyers and 1 in every 2 short sale buyers spent less than one month searching for a home before writing an offer.
How many offers do I have to write before one gets accepted? 10? 20?

7 out of 10 distressed property buyers wrote three or fewer offers before one was accepted.

I know I am getting a good deal but will the cost of repairs eat up the savings?

Half of REO buyers and almost one-third of short sale buyers spent less than $5,000 in repairs.

Brought to you by

The Helen Oliveri Team of Keller Williams Realty

www.helenoliveri.com

Comments No Comments »

A national look at the county-level costs levied by Uncle Sam.

No one looks forward to the day their annual property tax bill arrives. But those in affluent Westchester County, a suburban swath of New York that includes areas like Rye and Armonk, most likely dread it more than most. That’s because homeowners fork over a median $8,404 per year to live there. That’s seven times more than the $1,180 national average, and on a dollar basis, the highest in the nation.

Across the country, Marin County, Calif., holds a similar distinction. While not as lofty as Westchester’s, the region’s $5,233 median annual property taxes are the highest in the West. Residents of Loudon County, Va., a wealthy suburb of Washington, D.C.,  pay most in the South, or $4,844 annually. And in the Midwest, those in Lake County, Ill., lay out $6,050 a year to own a home.

Behind the Numbers

In ranking each county, we used the 2008 U.S. Census’ American Community Survey, which is conducted every year with a smaller sample of Americans than the decennial census (one home in every 40 receives the ACS, as opposed to the one in six that receives the 10-year census). The survey asked property owners how much they spent per month in property taxes. Researchers then used the median number per county over three years: 2006 through 2008. We separated the data into the four Census-defined regions: West, Midwest, Northeast and South, and ranked counties by their percentage above the national average property tax.

Three of the country’s top five highest-taxed counties—Westchester, Nassau and Rockland—are in New York state. Homes in these areas are pricey—in Westchester the median home value is $581,900, three times the national average, according to Census numbers—which naturally helps drive up those bills. But there is another factor at play here: Counties in the Census-defined Northeast region tend to be carved into an array of towns, villages and municipalities that don’t derive their property taxes from state-wide levies. This results in a greater dependence on property taxes for local revenue. Because the region also has highly concentrated pockets of wealth, it takes 19 out of the top 20 spots for highest-taxed counties.

“The more emphasis you put on local autonomy, the more you’re going to have local taxes picking up some of what, in other areas of the country, would tend to be state-level responsibilities,” says Youngman. “When there’s an emphasis on local government, it often means there’s an emphasis on property tax.”

But even in spite of big-government measures meant to ease one’s property tax burden, hefty bills can result if home values are high. Proposition 13, a piece of tax legislation introduced in 1978 that strictly limits property tax burdens, calls for Californians to pay only 1% of their home values in real estate tax.

In Marin County, a mountainous Bay Area suburb packed with sleek, expensive homes, the median household income is $88,101, and homes are valued at a median $912,100, with a median annual property tax of $5,233, more than four times the national average. It’s the same story in Santa Clara County, Calif., where taxes are $4,437, and San Mateo County, Calif., where the annual bill is $4,208.

“Even in a situation where we’re dealing with the classic original, trendsetting tax limitation measure, when you have property values as high as you do in Marin, you’re going to have high property taxes,” says Joan Youngman, senior fellow at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, a Cambridge, Mass.-based think tank that researches land taxation issues.

Sometimes a county’s high property tax rate has little to do with home values. In states where the federal or state government owns a big portion of the land, property taxes are concentrated in the privately owned segments of the state, and are typically high. Of the top 10 highest property tax counties in the West, King County, Wash., and Anchorage Municipality, Alaska, were the only non-California areas. In Washington, 30% of land is federally owned, and in Alaska, it’s a whopping 69%, the highest percentage in the country.

High property taxes, in addition to providing extra local services, often compensate for low sales or income taxes, which, says Youngman, works fine during boom times but disproportionately affects struggling homeowners in recessions. But swinging the pendulum in the opposite direction isn’t necessarily the answer, either. An even balance of revenue sources can avoid unduly burdening one segment of the population.

“A mixed-revenue system avoids putting the pressure on one single tax,” she says, adding that no solution is likely to appease the whole populace. “No tax is popular. Any place you look, people are going to be upset about certain aspects of it.”

Counties With Highest Property Taxes

Region: Midwest
County: Lake County, Ill.

Region: Northeast
County: Westchester County, N.Y.

Region: South
County: Loudoun County, Va.

Region: West
County: Marin County, Calif.

Click here to see the full list of Where Americans Pay Most In Property Taxes

Comments No Comments »

Home prices in 2009 rose 5.2 percent, according to latest housing market update from Altos Research LLC and Real IQ.

The two California-based data providers’ numbers are based on a 10-city composite index, which shows that prices effectively bottomed out in January 2009 at $470,017, climbed throughout the first half of the year to $509,030 in July before returning to a gradual downward trend and ended at $494,426 in December.

The researchers expect prices to continue showing modest declines throughout the seasonally weak winter months of 2010. During the month of December the index was down by 1.0 percent.

The Real-Time Housing Market Update from Altos and Real IQ reveals that real estate listing prices fell in 25 of 26 markets during December, with Miami being the only city where asking prices increased, up 1.0 percent for the month.

The largest monthly drop in the price of properties listed occurred in San Diego with prices falling 4.3 percent, followed closely by Salt Lake City which showed a 3.5 percent decline. San Diego also experienced the steepest quarterly drop in asking prices – down 7.3 percent.

The rate of decline has slowed in Las Vegas but that market continues to show the largest decline during the downturn. In November 2007, the median asking price was $342,140 but it fell to just $166,338 in December 2009.

The inventory of listed properties fell in 24 of 26 markets tracked in December, according to the report. Inventory declines were largest in Boston and the California markets of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Jose. The widespread drop-off in listed properties should help moderate near-term price declines, the report said.

Based on the researchers’ analysis, all markets except San Francisco had a median days-on-market of 100 or more in December. By far, the market with the slowest rate of inventory turn-over was Miami with a median of 247 days-on-market, or more than eight months.

Dsnews.com

Comments No Comments »