Posts Tagged “Housing”
|
Market Update
Housing activity continues to remain above year-ago levels despite some setbacks resulting from the now-expired tax credit. Improved stability in home prices with similar levels of distressed properties seen last year offers a hopeful sign the market is holding its ground. However, the economy still has a considerable way to go to achieve its full recovery.
Consumers are saving more and being picky about how they spend their money. While a higher savings rate means less spending in the near term, this is a positive sign that households are taking control of their finances to build some cushion that can be used to pay down debt and/or support future spending.
Existing home sales marked the twelfth consecutive month of year-over-year increase in June. On a monthly basis, sales activity eased 5.1% from May. The moderation in home sales reflects “understandable swings as buyers responded to the tax credits,” according to Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist. He anticipates such impact to show up in the next two months.


June’s median home price increased for the fourth consecutive month. Distressed homes, accounting for 32% of sales last month, continued holding home prices at highly affordable levels for the time being. While distressed sales hovered around the same level as a year ago, the gain in home prices is pointing to a sustained stability in the making.
Interest Rates
Mortgage rates set a new record low in July as consumer confidence softened and unemployment remained elevated. This presents a great opportunity for buyers and investors. Coupled with lowered home prices and a robust rental market, investors are finding their way to cash-flow opportunities. As recovery gains deeper roots, rates will need to rise to keep inflation in check.

Rates as of August 6.
This Month’s Video

Topics For Home Owners, Buyers & Sellers
Consumers Beware: New Credit Card Tricks

On May 22, 2009, President Obama signed into law the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009, marking a turning point for American consumers and ending the days of unfair rate hikes and hidden fees. While the new law offers significant safeguards, consumers still need to be vigilant against new practices designed to outflank the new rules.
Stay as informed as possible, read your statement , report any irregularities immediately, and watch for these tricks.
-
Shortened Billing Cycle: The CARD Act requires companies to allow a window of at least 21 days from when a statement is mailed and when payment is due. Cardholders are reporting being shortchanged on billing cycle time and then being assessed late-payment fees.
Advice: Watch out for shortened payment dates.
-
Sunday Due Dates: The CARD Act stipulates if a creditor does not receive or accept payments on weekends or holidays, then the date is extended and late-payment fees shouldn’t be triggered. However, some banks say they’re open for business even when there’s no mail delivery.
Advice: Don’t assume you are safe.
-
Low-Limit Cards: The CARD Act says a card’s total annual fees can’t exceed 25% of a borrower’s credit line. However, some issuers may be evading the fee restrictions by charging an up-front processing fee that doesn’t fall under the 25% cap.
Advice: Watch out for processing and other fees.
-
False Inactive Fees: Issuers will no longer be able to charge inactivity fees or extra charges for people who don’t spend a certain amount each year, effective August 22. However, some issuers are charging an annual fee that’s waived if cardholders reach a certain spending threshold.
Advice: Watch out for conditional annual fees.
-
Rebate Offers: Some credit cards offer refunds on finance charges when customers pay on time. However, rebate offers aren’t governed by the CARD Act, and such offers can be revoked suddenly and for any reason, leaving cardholders stuck with higher charges.
Advice: Rebates may translate to real savings in finance charges.
Source: The Wall Street Journal
|
|
Brought to you by
The Helen Oliveri Team of Keller Williams Realty
www.helenoliveri.com
|
No Comments »
A housing double-dip? More like a long, slow melt.
That is likely to be the takeaway from this week’s slew of housing reports. Tuesday could be a bright spot, with the National Association of Realtors expected to say existing-home sales rose some 5% from April to May to an annualized rate of about 6 million units.
That would be the third monthly increase in a row and the highest sales pace since November.
But that is unlikely to cement faith in the housing recovery. Sales have been juiced twice now by the government’s home-buyer tax credits, which expired April 30 for contracts and on June 30 for closings.
Indeed, the Commerce Department on Wednesday is expected to say new-home sales dropped 20% last month, according to economists surveyed by Dow Jones, to an annualized 400,000 units.
That would largely unwind sharp gains recorded in March and April ahead of the contract deadline. Already last week, Commerce said new home construction dropped by 10% last month.
It is far from clear this marks the start of a “double-dip” for the housing market. The hardest-hit segment—new home sales—is a small part of the market, accounting for just 8% of homes sold in April even with the tax credit’s lift.
Plus, its weakness should dissuade further building activity—a positive as it should stop inventory of unsold houses swelling even further. And the hit to overall gross domestic product is likely to be small: Residential investment accounts for just 2.4% of GDP.
Meanwhile, the much larger market of existing-home sales should hold up better. For one, existing homes run about 15%-20% cheaper on average than newly built ones. Sales, while likely to slump this summer, should firm toward year-end if the labor market continues its gradual improvement.
And affordability continues to improve: falling prices and historically low mortgage rates have lowered typical monthly payments to about 15% of household income, down from 21% in 2007.
Home prices may well slide further as the market searches for a floor. But a 5% decline, say, over the next year or two isn’t exactly a double-dip, and should ultimately support a healthier recovery.
Policy makers shouldn’t get in the way.
Wsj.com
No Comments »
|
Commentary

The housing sector continues to show signs of recovery. Together the tax credit (which expired at the end of April), the more upbeat consumer confidence, and favorable market conditions all contributed to bolstering April’s sales activity – with existing home sales increasing for the second straight month.
The return of buyer confidence with much of the home price correction believed to be over, encouraging economic developments and historically low mortgage rates, will provide the stepping stone for further market stabilization.
Meanwhile, stagnant job growth and elevated levels of foreclosure continue to be cause for concern. The government is now taking proactive steps to restructure the mortgage industry with risk-management measures seen by experts as a “huge cut in red tape” that would ultimately benefit consumers.
The Housing Market
Existing Home Sales
Existing home sales strengthened in April to 5.77 million, up 8.7% from March and 22.8%from last April. This is the tenth consecutive month of year-over-year increases.
According to Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, although part of the uptick was expected from the tax credit, there’s also been a return of buyer confidence, for those who remained on the sideline last year. The return of confidence is a result of stabilized prices, an improved economy, and continued advantageous interest rates.
In March, 49% of sales were from first-time buyers.

Median Home Price
The median price for an existing home was $173,100 in April, up 2.1% from a year ago and 4% from March. Distressed homes, accounting for a third of last month’s sales, continued skewing prices downward slightly as they typically are discounted 15% compared to typical home sales. Overall, prices this past year showed increased stability over the previous year.

Inventory
Total housing inventory rose slightly to 4.04 million in March, representing slightly less than an eight-and-a-half month supply of sales (if homes continue to sell at the current pace consistently and no new homes come on the market). Compared to the previous year, there are now 3% more homes on the market. Although this is the first rise in twenty consecutive months of decline when compared to the previous year, NAR’s chief economist believes this increase can be attributed to the summer selling season and that home prices are back on track.
Mortgage Rates
Mortgage rates dipped back below 5% this month due largely in part to the European debt crisis. As confidence in the value of the Euro eroded, more investors chose the U.S. dollar instead. With more demand for dollars, the cost of debt (interest rate) dropped. This event has also shown the global recovery is not free-and-clear of roadblocks to complete recovery. However, experts still anticipate rates will increase to between 6% and 6.5% by the end of the year. As the recovery gains increasing traction, the Federal Reserve will need to increase rates to prevent inflation.

Affordability
Affordability remains advantageous, supported by some of the lowest mortgage rates in decades as well as less expensive home prices. The home price-to-income ratio continues to remain well below the historical average of 25%. The ratio now stands at 14.9%.
Sources: National Association of Realtors, Freddie Mac
Government Action
FHA Turns to Lenders to Monitor Brokers

As the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), the government agency that insures home loans, saw its market share rise to about one-third of the mortgage market last year, up from 2% in 2006, the number of brokers seeking to arrange FHA-backed loans has mushroomed to 9,043 at the end of 2009 from 5,759 just two years earlier.
The agency, finding itself inadequately equipped to monitor its brokers, is shifting the responsibility to its lenders.
The FHA expects the new policies to result in better risk management, and the cut in red tape should produce better rates for consumers.
As of May 20, the FHA no longer certifies mortgage brokers or tracks the performance of brokers’ loans. Instead, lenders are now required to sponsor brokers and assume responsibility for loans they originate, including losses from fraud or mistakes in underwriting. In addition to revamping broker insight, the agency also beefed up oversight of its lenders by increasing net-worth requirements to $1 million from $250,000. The change is in effect for one year for existing lenders.
Source: WSJ.com
Topics For Buyers & Sellers
Myths about Distressed Properties – Debunked!
Distressed properties – foreclosures and short sales alike – represent potentially great value for prospective buyers. However, common misconceptions about the time and money investment involved with buying such properties may keep many from inquiring further into this market. KW Research survey findings, taken from more than 2,500 KW associate respondents who have worked with distressed properties, can help steer clear of concerns as you make your way to homeownership.
| Buyer Concern |
Research Found |
|
It’s going to take forever to find
one I want.
|
3 out of 5 REO buyers and 1 in every 2 short sale buyers spent less than one month searching for a home before writing an offer. |
| How many offers do I have to write before one gets accepted? 10? 20? |
7 out of 10 distressed property buyers wrote three or fewer offers before one was accepted.
|
| I know I am getting a good deal but will the cost of repairs eat up the savings? |
Half of REO buyers and almost one-third of short sale buyers spent less than $5,000 in repairs.
|
|
|
Brought to you by
The Helen Oliveri Team of Keller Williams Realty
www.helenoliveri.com |
No Comments »
NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–A new Harris Poll provides some unpleasant numbers about the housing crisis and the collapse of the house price bubble. Fully 24% of people with mortgages believe they owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. One in nine homeowners (11%) with mortgages report having “a great deal of difficulty” in paying off their mortgage. Another 18% are having “some difficulty.” This comes at a time when two-thirds of all adults (65%) are concerned that their families’ incomes “will not be enough to cover all their costs and expenses this year.”
“will not be enough to cover all their costs and expenses this year.”
These are some of the results of The Harris Poll of 2,320 adults surveyed online between March 1 and 8, 2010 by Harris Interactive.
Other interesting findings include:
- Over two-thirds (69%) of adults who are homeowners have a mortgage that they need to pay off.
- People whose homes are believed to be worth less than the money owed on their mortgages are common across all income groups. Fully 26% of adults with mortgages who have household incomes of $75,000 or more believe their homes are worth less than the balance of their mortgages.
- Almost a third (29%) of adults with mortgages are having some difficulty (18%) or a great deal of difficulty (11%) paying off their mortgages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Among those who believe their homes are worth less than their outstanding mortgages, fully 26% are having a great deal of difficulty and another 23% are having some difficulty paying them off. |
- The two-thirds (65%) of all adults who are concerned about having enough income to cover all their costs and expenses include 26% who are very concerned and 39% who are somewhat concerned.
- Among those who believe that their homes are worth less than their mortgages, fully 42% are very concerned and another 38% are somewhat concerned about not having enough income to cover their costs.
- Unsurprisingly, income levels make a big difference. Concerns about not having enough income to cover costs and expenses is much higher among people with household incomes below $35,000 (40% are very concerned) than among those with incomes over $75,000 (16% are very concerned).
So what?
These findings underline the very large number of people whose homes are worth less than their outstanding mortgages and the even larger numbers who are worried about covering their costs and expenses generally. If the percentages are converted into numbers, approximately 27 million adults believe they are “under water” – that their houses are worth less than their mortgage debts.
Read full story…
Website: www.helenoliveri.com
Blogs: www.helenoliveri.com/blog
Linked-In: www.linkedin.com/in/helenoliveri
Twitter: www.twitter.com/helenoliveri
Active Rain: www.activerain.com/helenoliveri
No Comments »
NEW YORK (Reuters) – Hedge fund firm Pine River, which makes big bets on housing, is bracing for a double dip in that market, its chief executive officer said on Tuesday.
“There are still issues in the housing markets and it would not surprise us to see the recovery turn down,” Brian Taylor, who founded the $1.6 billion hedge fund eight years ago, said at the Reuters Private Equity and Hedge Funds Summit in New York.
For Pine River, where Taylor and his seven partners work to identify relative value mispricings ahead of the curve, both a full-fledged recovery or a double-dip recession would provide a chance to make money for clients, Taylor said. “There is opportunity to profit either way.”
Last year, Pine River gained about 90 percent, far more than the average hedge fund’s roughly 20 percent return.
As Taylor sees it, the market for residential mortgage-backed securities turned from dull to exciting virtually overnight during the financial crisis, leaving his team with large opportunities that few others seek now.
“The amount of risk has never been greater,” he said. “Armageddon was avoided in late 2008 and 2009,” but the housing finance market is still awful, he said, with millions of homeowners sitting on liabilities that exceed their assets.
“Today there are still pockets of undervaluation left over from 2008,” Taylor said.
Additionally Pine River is benefiting from a lack of competition thanks to the retreat of government-controlled mortgage buyers Freddie Mac (FRE.N) and Fannie Mae (FNM.N) from relative value investing in the RMBS market.
(Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss. Editing by Robert MacMillan)
Website: www.helenoliveri.com
Blogs: www.helenoliveri.com/blog
Linked-In: www.linkedin.com/in/helenoliveri
Twitter: www.twitter.com/helenoliveri
Active Rain: www.activerain.com/helenoliveri
No Comments »
|